Two estimation methods for determining the order of magnitude of the indirect effect
To measure the indirect effect, we first estimate the total effect of a rise in oil prices on consumer prices. The indirect effect is then obtained by subtracting the direct effect already identified. It is therefore a residual between figures of a few tenths of a point, which are themselves imperfectly measured. The resulting ranges should therefore be interpreted as broad orders of magnitude.
We use two complementary methods for this purpose. The first method (row B of Table 1 below) involves dividing the increase in the net oil import bill resulting from a EUR 10 rise in the price of oil per barrel by household consumption. It assumes, for the sake of simplicity, that this additional cost is passed on in full to consumer prices, either directly or indirectly. It therefore provides a rather high estimate. The import volumes are taken from the Eurostat's oil and petroleum products annual data.
The second method is based on Eurostat’s input-output tables, which describe inter-sectoral trade, in order to allocate imported oil more accurately across the various components of demand. In particular, it subtracts the oil used to produce exports and adds the oil incorporated into imported goods other than oil. In the absence of sufficiently detailed data on foreign production technologies and on oil alone, this adjustment (row C in the table) provides, rather, a lower bound (row D).
Table 1: Direct, total and indirect effects on consumer prices in 2025 of a EUR 10 rise in the price of a barrel of crude oil in France and in the euro area (percentage points of consumer prices).
| France | Euro area |
Direct effect (a) | 0.25 | 0.21 |
Total effect, method 1 (b) | 0.36 | 0.45 |
Indirect effect, method 1 (b−a) | 0.11 | 0.24 |
Adjustment based on input-output tables (c) | 0.85 | 0.84 |
Total effect, method 2 (d=b×c) | 0.31 | 0.38 |
Indirect effect, method 2 (d−a) | 0.06 | 0.17 |
The sensitivity of consumer prices to oil prices has almost halved since 2016
Chart 1 summarises the main finding. Today, a EUR 10 rise in the price of oil per barrel would increase consumer prices by 0.3% to 0.4% in France, compared with around 0.6% in 2016. In the euro area, the total effect would be 0.4% to 0.5%, compared with around 0.7% in 2016. Sensitivity to changes in the price of oil has therefore dropped significantly in both economies.
It should be noted that the impact for 2016 is slightly higher than that estimated in the 2018 blog post. This revision reflects the publication of final national accounts figures as well as the use of 2016 input-output tables, which were not available when the previous blog was written.
Lower oil intensity throughout the production chain
This decline in the sensitivity of consumer prices to oil prices can be observed in both channels. In France, once the direct effect has been factored out, the indirect effect is estimated to drop from around 0.2 percentage point to 0.1 percentage point. Similarly, in the euro area, the indirect effect is estimated to fall from around 0.3 percentage point to 0.2 percentage point. Rising oil prices are therefore still fuelling non-energy inflation, but to a lesser extent than in the mid-2010s.
The indirect effect of a rise in oil prices depends on the quantity of oil required to produce the goods and services consumed by households. The more oil-intensive production is, the stronger the pass-through of an oil shock to prices throughout the economy. However, between 2016 and 2025, net oil imports declined in volume terms, while household consumption rose in value terms. In France, the number of barrels imported per billion euro of consumption thus fell by around 39%. In the euro area, this figure is close to 35%. This finding remains qualitatively true if one takes into account the differences in oil intensity across the components of demand – notably imports and exports – using input-output tables.
In other words, the production of goods and services consumed by households now requires less oil than it did ten years ago. This reflects, at least in part, an improvement in energy efficiency or a change in the energy mix. Under these circumstances, a EUR 10 rise in the price of oil per barrel now represents a smaller additional cost relative to household expenditure than it did in 2016. The rise in production costs passed on to consumer prices is therefore less significant. This explains the reduction in the indirect effect of an oil shock on inflation.
A shock that remains significant, but less severe than in 2016
Rising oil prices are still fuelling inflation, both directly through the fuel and heating oil consumed by households, and indirectly through businesses’ production costs. However, the extent of this pass-through is significantly smaller today than in 2016. This reduced sensitivity can be explained by two complementary developments: households are consuming fewer petroleum products and, more broadly, the goods and services they consume incorporate less oil.
This estimate does not account for either the precise speed of transmission or second-round effects through wages. It provides an accounting benchmark for assessing the scale of a shock. In a context of high oil price volatility, this benchmark is useful: a EUR 10 rise in the price of oil per barrel no longer has the same inflationary impact as it did ten years ago.