Early steps to identify climate-related risks
The ACPR’s work on climate risk began in 2015 in the context of implementing France’s Environmental Transition and Green Growth Act, which established a strict extra-financial disclosure framework for institutional investors. Following the publication of two initial reports in 2019 on the exposure of banks and insurers to climate risk, two task forces were set up with the industry to look at climate risk governance and scenario analysis. This led to the release of two best practice guides on climate risk governance and management for banks (2020) and insurers (2022). Work on scenarios paved the way for a pilot exercise of climate scenario analysis. The first of its kind and scale, the exercise was conducted in the two sectors and drew on the initial scenarios published by the NGFS.
Follow-up on the pilot climate exercise
In 2020, the ACPR organised a pilot climate exercise, which functioned as a stress test of climate-related financial risks through to 2050. The findings were published in May 2021. The ACPR teamed up with 9 banking groups and 15 insurers, representing 85% and 75% respectively of the French market, to stage a full-scale and stringent assessment of climate-related risks. This exercise illustrates the driving role played by France’s authorities and the Paris financial community, as well as the progress made in efforts to stop global warming since 2015.
The pilot exercise found French banks and insurers to be moderately exposed overall to climate-related risks. But considerable efforts are still needed to help to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 and thus contain the temperature trajectory between now and the end of the century.
The exercise was innovative in a number of ways, including its application to the two sectors (banking and insurance), its attempt to assess interactions through risk transfer mechanisms, in its degree of geographical and sector granularity, and in the dynamic balance sheet assumptions used to assess the strategies of individual institutions. To date, it is the only exercise that has also integrated the health risks linked to global warming. This exercise had a galvanising effect on French financial institutions and was a major influence on the work of other supervisors, including the ECB.
The innovations of ACPR pilot climate exercise:
Short-term, medium-term and long-term risk assessment horizon | Innovative methodologies (scenario analysis applied at sector level) | Innovative assumptions (dynamic balance sheet in particular) | Coverage of physical and transition risks | Common risk assessment assumptions used by participating institutions |
Beyond the methodological findings, two key risk-related takeaways:
- Vulnerabilities associated with physical risk are far from insignificant: based on information provided by insurers, the cost of claims could increase by between five and six times in some French départements between 2020 and 2050;
- Financial institutions were able to assess corrective actions (exits from some sectors, for example) and take note of new risks: potential mismatch between exit strategies for certain GHG-emitting activities and the goal of maintaining market share, financing the economy or maintaining customer relationships, potentially resulting in longer-than-expected exposure to transition or physical risks.
Pan-European stress tests
In January 2022, the ECB announced the launch of a prudential stress test covering climate risk, to assess banks’ readiness to withstand the economic and financial shocks that these risks could trigger. The Banque de France and the ACPR made a significant contribution to efforts to prepare this cross-European exercise, providing the SSM with the experience gained at national level. |
|
Joint ACPR-AMF report on monitoring and assessing the climate commitments of members of the financial centre
Working through their respective Climate and Sustainable Finance Commissions, the ACPR and the AMF published three joint reports, in 2020, 2021 and 2022, based on publicly available information and questionnaires sent to key players in the Paris financial community, supplemented by numerous bilateral exchanges and analyses using internal data held by the two authorities.
Regarding the exposure of financial institutions to fossil fuels, the authorities believe that institutions need to work harder to recognise these exposures more robustly, transparently and uniformly, and that efforts should be concentrated in the first place on capturing the entire value chain and the widest possible business scope.
The ACPR and AMF also said that financial institutions should do more to establish formal customer support and shareholder engagement policies, and that the impact of employee training should be more clearly detailed or assessed.
The most recent joint report, which was published in late October 2022, also found that previously noted efforts have stalled. The authorities therefore called on financial institutions to act swiftly to close the gap between the currently observed level of transparency on voluntary engagements and the requirements arising from regulations currently being applied or still to come.